I address his pattern recognition point here the same day he made it.

He’s just moving goalposts, and he still manages to be wrong.

There is nothing “statistically significant” because he never does any sort of significance test, and doesn’t even present a formal null hypothesis. He’s keeping it vague because, again, he’s a charlatan.

I know it’s easy to just go with what you want to believe, but it’s not hard to see this guy contradicting himself with subsequent videos and losing steam even to his own audience. Just take notes while watching what he releases and it’ll become obvious to you, too.