Naim Kabir
Nov 12, 2020

--

Hey--here's an edited note where I clarify. I believe I'm using equivalent terms to Ayyadurai.

Also, I'm refuting a claim from someone else--the burden of proof is stronger when you're positing that a crime is occurring; whereas here I'm just showing that there are natural explanations to the trends Dr. Ayyadurai is calling fraudulent.

---

EDITED NOTE: Thank-you to the many respondents who have told me that the Y-axis quantity is explicitly the difference between straight-ticket voters for the Republican Party and votes for Trump. Straight-ticket voters have the option to manually choose individual candidates to override party defaults. Since a straight-ticket Republican vote with or without Trump is the equivalent to voting for all down-ballot Republicans, I’m dealing with the same quantity — I’ve just put it in more general terms. For the X-axis, Dr. Ayyadurai also uses this fraction straight-ticket Republican voters, whereas I keep it general and call it the “inferred % of Republican voters”. Again, these quantities are equivalent for the purposes of my analysis. As always, if you don’t agree and think it would change the results meaningfully, let me know.

--

--

Naim Kabir
Naim Kabir

Written by Naim Kabir

Engineer. Focused on experimentation, causal inference, and good software design. naimkabir.com

No responses yet